<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What rank checking and nose picking have in common&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitemost.com.au/blog/2007/11/22/what-rank-checking-and-nose-picking-have-in-common/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitemost.com.au/blog/2007/11/22/what-rank-checking-and-nose-picking-have-in-common/</link>
	<description>Are you getting the most out of your site?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:24:14 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John King</title>
		<link>http://www.sitemost.com.au/blog/2007/11/22/what-rank-checking-and-nose-picking-have-in-common/comment-page-1/#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>John King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 02:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitemost.com.au/blog/2007/11/22/what-rank-checking-and-nose-picking-have-in-common/#comment-430</guid>
		<description>True enough I guess, however I&#039;ve found that while rankings tend to jump around, once they keep jumping up and down from the first page they&#039;ll end up staying on the front page eventually. Also once new sites start ranking within the top 100 they slowly/quickly proceed towards the front page. I use this data to strengthen links some of these pages and pages of a similar topic. I currently do a weekly report on our top 10 keyword rankings in all the search engines which takes about 20 minutes to complete. I also check a larger keyword list about once a month. My reason for doing so: After one year of marketing for this company they can look at a very detailed evolution from non-ranking oblivion to top ranking bliss.

For my personal campaigns I generally check only one or two keywords and my analytics program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True enough I guess, however I&#8217;ve found that while rankings tend to jump around, once they keep jumping up and down from the first page they&#8217;ll end up staying on the front page eventually. Also once new sites start ranking within the top 100 they slowly/quickly proceed towards the front page. I use this data to strengthen links some of these pages and pages of a similar topic. I currently do a weekly report on our top 10 keyword rankings in all the search engines which takes about 20 minutes to complete. I also check a larger keyword list about once a month. My reason for doing so: After one year of marketing for this company they can look at a very detailed evolution from non-ranking oblivion to top ranking bliss.</p>
<p>For my personal campaigns I generally check only one or two keywords and my analytics program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Pilatowski</title>
		<link>http://www.sitemost.com.au/blog/2007/11/22/what-rank-checking-and-nose-picking-have-in-common/comment-page-1/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Pilatowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 13:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitemost.com.au/blog/2007/11/22/what-rank-checking-and-nose-picking-have-in-common/#comment-422</guid>
		<description>Excellent point. I constantly have to explain to our financier that rankings are not static and that we will jump around. It still does not stop him from checking daily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point. I constantly have to explain to our financier that rankings are not static and that we will jump around. It still does not stop him from checking daily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Cronin</title>
		<link>http://www.sitemost.com.au/blog/2007/11/22/what-rank-checking-and-nose-picking-have-in-common/comment-page-1/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 01:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitemost.com.au/blog/2007/11/22/what-rank-checking-and-nose-picking-have-in-common/#comment-416</guid>
		<description>Pete, You&#039;re spot on with this. Google Analytics tells me that one of the search terms used to arrive at my site was &#039;work&#039;. I can&#039;t see anyway that I&#039;d rank for that term! It must have been some bizarre combination of localised search etc...

One thing I&#039;d like to see added to Analytics is just which search brought the traffic. It can tell me which search engine (ie Google), but I have no idea if the traffic is coming from the main search, the blog search, the image search etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete, You&#8217;re spot on with this. Google Analytics tells me that one of the search terms used to arrive at my site was &#8216;work&#8217;. I can&#8217;t see anyway that I&#8217;d rank for that term! It must have been some bizarre combination of localised search etc&#8230;</p>
<p>One thing I&#8217;d like to see added to Analytics is just which search brought the traffic. It can tell me which search engine (ie Google), but I have no idea if the traffic is coming from the main search, the blog search, the image search etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
